Edexcel Separate Sciences · Physics · Paper 1

SP2 · Motion and forcesTopic 2 — Motion and forces

PLCWordPLCPDFMind map

Newton’s laws, momentum and stopping distances

Revise the key ideas

Resultant force and Newton’s first law

  • The resultant force is the overall force on one object after all its forces are combined, taking account of their directions (their vector sum). Choose positive and negative directions consistently.
  • A 1000 N driving force forward and 500 N drag backward give a resultant of 500 N forward.
    Resultant force on a carDriving force 1000 N right; drag 500 N left; resultant 500 N right.Car1000 N500 NResultant: 500 N forward
    Subtract opposing forces; retain the direction of the larger force.
  • Balanced forces give zero resultant and no acceleration. A stationary object stays stationary; a moving object continues at constant velocity.
  • Newton’s first law describes this behaviour in the absence of a resultant external force. Motion does not require a continuing resultant force.
  • Unbalanced forces cause acceleration: a change in speed, direction or both. A moving object can slow down if the resultant opposes its velocity.
  • Circular motion at constant speed requires a resultant force towards the centre. This centripetal force changes the direction of velocity, so the object accelerates.

Mass, weight and resistance

  • Mass describes how much matter an object contains and is measured in kilograms (kg). It also measures how difficult it is to change the object’s velocity (inertia). Weight is the gravitational force on the object, measured in newtons (N).
  • Weight = mass × gravitational field strength, W = mg. Near Earth use g = 10 N/kg in these examples or the value given.
  • A 6 kg object weighs 60 N where g = 10 N/kg. Its mass stays 6 kg on the Moon, but its weight is smaller because the gravitational field is weaker.
  • Measure weight with a calibrated newton meter. On a weight–mass graph, the gradient is gravitational field strength.
  • Air or water resistance (drag) opposes an object’s movement relative to the fluid around it. Drag generally increases with speed. Streamlining reduces it.
  • A falling object initially accelerates because weight exceeds drag. As speed increases, drag increases and the resultant becomes smaller.
  • At terminal velocity, drag balances weight and acceleration is zero. The object continues falling at constant velocity; the forces have not disappeared.
    Terminal velocity forcesEqual upward drag and downward weight on a falling object.DragWeightEqual forces; falling at constant velocity
    At terminal velocity, resultant force is zero.
  • Opening a parachute increases drag: the falling person slows until reaching a new, lower terminal velocity.

Newton’s second and third laws

  • Newton’s second law is F = ma: resultant force in N = mass in kg × acceleration in m/s². For the same mass, increasing resultant force increases acceleration.
  • For the same resultant force, a larger mass has a smaller acceleration. Inertial mass = F/a. It measures how strongly an object resists a change in velocity.
  • In the trolley core practical, vary pulling force while keeping total moving mass constant, or vary mass while keeping force constant. Use light gates or a motion sensor to calculate acceleration.
  • Keep track and release conditions consistent, minimise friction and repeat measurements. A hanging mass and pulley can provide a pulling force; the hanging mass belongs to the moving system.
  • Newton’s third law: when two objects interact, each exerts an equal and opposite force of the same type on the other.
  • A foot pushes a ball forward; the ball pushes the foot backward. These forces act on different objects and do not balance each other on the ball.
  • A book’s weight and the table’s upward normal force can balance on the book. They are not a third-law pair: the partner to Earth pulling the book is the book pulling Earth.
    Forces on a supported bookOnly forces on the book: upward normal force and downward weight. Their third-law partners act on other objects.BookNormal forceWeight
    Balanced forces on the book are not a Newton’s third-law pair.

Momentum and collision forces (Higher tier)

  • Momentum = mass × velocity, p = mv, in kg m/s. Momentum is a vector, so direction matters.
  • Total momentum is conserved in a closed system with no resultant external force: add the momenta of all objects before and after a collision, using signed velocities.
  • A 2 kg trolley at 3 m/s hits a stationary 1 kg trolley and they stick together. Initial momentum is 6 kg m/s; final combined mass is 3 kg, so final velocity is 2 m/s.
    Sticking trolley collisionBefore: 2 kg at 3 m/s + 1 kg at rest → Total momentum = 2 × 3 + 1 × 0 = 6 kg m/s → After: 3 kg at 2 m/s; momentum = 6 kg m/sBefore: 2 kg at 3 m/s + 1 kg at restTotal momentum = 2 × 3 + 1 × 0 = 6 kg m/sAfter: 3 kg at 2 m/s; momentum = 6 kg m/s
    Negligible external resultant force allows momentum conservation.
  • Average resultant force = change in momentum ÷ time, F = (mv − mu)/t for constant mass. Use the sign of the velocity change.
  • For the same change in momentum, increasing stopping time reduces average force. Crumple zones, airbags and seat belts extend stopping time and reduce injury risk.
  • Momentum conservation does not mean kinetic energy is always conserved. In a sticking collision, some kinetic energy is transferred to other stores.

Reaction time and stopping distance

  • Stopping distance = thinking distance + braking distance. Thinking distance is how far a vehicle travels before the driver starts braking.
    Stopping distanceStopping distance is thinking distance followed by braking distance.Thinking distanceBraking distanceHazard seenBrakes appliedStoppedTotal stopping distance
    A delay before braking adds to the distance travelled.
  • Thinking distance = speed × reaction time, assuming speed stays constant during the reaction interval. At 20 m/s and 0.5 s, it is 10 m.
  • Reaction time varies between people and conditions; drugs, alcohol, tiredness and distractions can increase it. A simple ruler-drop test can investigate reaction time with repeats.
  • Braking distance depends on speed, mass, braking force, tyre condition, brake condition and road surface. Wet or icy roads reduce available friction.
  • Higher speed increases thinking distance and increases braking distance more strongly. With fixed braking force, braking distance is proportional to speed squared.
  • Large decelerations require large forces and can cause injury. Safety features reduce force by increasing collision time, but do not remove the momentum change.

Braking energy and estimating stopping distances

  • Braking transfers the vehicle’s kinetic energy into thermal energy in brakes, tyres, road and surroundings. With an approximately constant braking force, work done Fd equals initial kinetic energy ½mv².
  • Rearrange to braking distance d = mv²/(2F). If mass and braking force stay unchanged, braking distance is proportional to the square of initial speed: doubling speed gives four times the braking distance.
    Braking distance versus speedFor fixed mass and braking force, braking distance rises as speed squared. Relative speed 1 gives relative distance 1; speed 2 gives distance 4.d/d₀v/v₀01214
    The curve follows d/d₀ = (v/v₀)²; the axes use relative quantities.
  • Thinking distance = speed × reaction time. With the same reaction time, doubling speed doubles thinking distance. Stopping distance adds thinking and braking distances. It does not exactly follow speed squared, because only the braking part does in this model.
  • For a 1000 kg car travelling at 20 m/s with 5000 N braking force, kinetic energy is 200000 J and braking distance is 40 m. With reaction time 0.7 s, thinking distance is 14 m and total stopping distance is 54 m.
  • Use a realistic speed range to estimate emergency stopping distances and state assumptions. Wet or icy roads can reduce available braking force and lengthen braking distance; vehicle condition and driver response also matter.
  • In this model, increasing mass with an unchanged braking force increases braking distance. In real vehicles the available force can also change with mass, so distinguish the specified calculation model from a universal rule.

Watch SP2 · Motion and forces · Topic 2 — Motion and forces

Revise motion and forces with this narrated video. Use the player controls to pause, seek, adjust the volume or mute. Turn English captions on or off using the captions menu.

Open or download the video · English captions

Mind map

Use the branches to recall the ideas and explain their connections. Check the revision notes for the full detail.

Part A · Core ideas

View Part A · Core ideas mind map
SP2 Part A · Core ideas mind map: Resultant, Weight / drag, Momentum · Higher, Stopping. A text version follows.
Open the full-size map to zoom. Download the PDF to print on A4 or enlarge to A3.

Open full-size map Download A4 PDF

Part B · Braking models and stopping estimates

View Part B · Braking models and stopping estimates mind map
SP2 Part B · Braking models and stopping estimates mind map: Braking model, Stopping context. A text version follows.
Open the full-size map to zoom. Download the PDF to print on A4 or enlarge to A3.

Open full-size map Download A4 PDF

Read the mind map as text

Resultant

  • Vector sum: Combine directions; 1,000 N forward − 500 N drag = 500 N
  • First law: Zero resultant → rest or constant velocity, not no forces
  • Acceleration: Unbalanced force changes velocity; circular force points inward
  • Second law: F = ma; larger mass at same force → smaller acceleration
  • Trolley practical: Change force or total moving mass; control friction / release
  • Third law: Equal opposite same-type forces act on DIFFERENT objects

Weight / drag

  • Mass and weight: Mass kg / inertia; weight N; W = mg
  • Measurement: 6 kg → 60 N at g = 10 N/kg; W–m slope gives g
  • Fluid resistance: Drag opposes relative motion; increases with speed
  • Terminal velocity: Drag rises until balances weight; falling speed constant
  • Parachute: More drag slows descent to a lower terminal velocity

Momentum · Higher

  • Momentum: p = mv; kg m/s; use signed velocities
  • Conservation: No resultant external force → total before = total after
  • Sticking example: 2 kg × 3 m/s = 3 kg × 2 m/s
  • Collision force: Average F = Δp/Δt; longer stopping time reduces force
  • Energy distinction: Momentum conserved does not imply kinetic energy conserved

Stopping

  • Two distances: Stopping = thinking + braking
  • Thinking: Speed × reaction time; 20 m/s × 0.5 s = 10 m
  • Reaction time: Fatigue, alcohol / drugs, distractions; ruler-drop repeats
  • Braking: Speed / mass / force / road / tyres; fixed-force distance ∝ v²
  • Safety: Crumple zones / restraints extend time, reducing average force

Braking model

  • Energy transfer: Brakes / tyres / road warm; Fd = ½mv² for constant braking force
  • Distance: d = mv²/(2F); fixed m / F: double speed → fourfold distance
  • Worked model: 1,000 kg at 20 m/s; F = 5,000 N → 200,000 J / 40 m

Stopping context

  • Thinking: vt; double v → double thinking distance; total not simply ∝ v²
  • Total example: 0.7 s reaction: 14 m thinking + 40 m braking = 54 m
  • Assumptions: Wet / icy roads reduce available force; state speed / conditions
  • Mass qualification: More mass at fixed F → farther; real available F may also change

Connections

  • Resultant → Weight / drag: Balanced weight and drag produce constant terminal velocity.
  • Momentum · Higher → Stopping: Longer collision time reduces injury forces.

Part connections

  • Part A · Core ideas: Resultant → Weight / drag — Balanced weight and drag produce constant terminal velocity.
  • Part A · Core ideas: Momentum · Higher → Stopping — Longer collision time reduces injury forces.
  • Part B · Braking models and stopping estimates: Braking model → Stopping context — Stopping distance combines two parts with different speed dependence.
  • Part B · Braking models and stopping estimates: Stopping context → Braking model — Road conditions and the fixed-force assumption limit model predictions.